Cases do not only show what has been digitised, but above all how a challenge was translated into a workable digital outcome. That is why 2dA does not use cases as generic success stories, but as concrete examples of substantive choices and their effect on quality, access and usability.
A case should show what the challenge was, why the chosen approach was logical and what difference it made in practice. Was it about fragile material? Large volumes? Privacy? Metadata? A good case makes clear which substantive considerations led to a better result.
Every case should show what has been solved in substantive terms, not just that something has been done. That is why the starting point, challenge, chosen route, quality choices, delivery and effect on use matter more than generic satisfaction language. Decision-makers are looking for evidence of insight, not only evidence of activity.
Strong cases help visitors see their own situation more clearly. That is why 2dA links cases to themes such as heritage, files, corporate archives, metadata, restoration and privacy. This quickly clarifies which route most closely resembles their own context.
Approach | Clients | Archive digitisation | Heritage digitisation
Would you like to know which route best fits your situation? View the related pages or get in touch.